The SLP government has introduced a seemingly innocuous 2.5% tax. On the surface, it appears to be a minor adjustment to the nation’s fiscal policies. However, a deeper examination reveals that this tax is far from benign. In some cases, it effectively amounts to a whopping 5% increase, hitting citizens’ pockets harder than expected.
One of the most alarming aspects of this new tax is the way it operates – it imposes a levy on both goods entering the country and services. At first glance, this might not raise immediate concerns. Still, the devil is in the details, as the tax creates a scenario of double taxation that negatively impacts businesses and consumers alike.
What makes this tax policy particularly egregious is that it extends its reach to services. Services, which typically aren’t subject to import duties, are now burdened with an extra 2.5% charge. This move significantly increases the cost of services across the board, from retail and education to transportation and entertainment. The consequences of this are far-reaching, making it harder for citizens to access essential goods and services and diminishing their quality of life.
As an example, a service provider has sent out a notice to their customers informing them of a 5% increase in their monthly bills due to the Government’s new tax. The company went on to inform customers that if their current bill was say $150, then based on the new tax their bill would now be $158.00, 5% more than it was previously.
With the effective increase of 5% in some cases, this tax is more of a financial hit than citizens were led to believe. It’s imperative for the government to reconsider this policy and explore fairer alternatives that do not disproportionately affect the very people it should be serving. # PierreEhCare #PuttingYouWorse
Joachim Henry no longer incharge of National Conservation Authority. Why the lack of Transparency?
The decision by Prime Minister Philip J Pierre to dismiss Joackim Henry from his role as the Minister with responsibility for the National Conservation Authority (NCA) has raised several questions and concerns among the public. Notably, the lack of public notice regarding this significant decision has left many wondering about the rationale behind the abrupt removal of an elected official…
Read more
by Content Manager