In the wake of increasing crime rates, the response of Prime Minister Philip J Pierre has drawn significant criticism. His repeated deflection, citing that he is “not a policeman” and referencing his father’s role as a policeman, has raised concerns about his understanding of the responsibilities inherent in his position as the Minister for National Security.
This recurring excuse does not align with the expectations and responsibilities of a national leader, particularly in a role directly overseeing the nation’s security apparatus. The Prime Minister’s statement seems to reflect a misunderstanding of the significance of his position. As the highest-ranking official in matters of national security, the Prime Minister is not expected to don a uniform and patrol the streets, but he is anticipated to provide strategic leadership, policy direction, and resources to the police force.
The rising crime rates demand a proactive and decisive response from the highest levels of government. The public looks to their leaders for reassurance and action in times of crisis. By distancing himself from direct responsibility, the Prime Minister undermines public confidence in the government’s ability to handle critical security issues. #PierreEhCare#PuttingYouWorse#SaveOurSaintLucia#PeoplePower
3 Questions for Stephenson King
While we send our prayers up to the heavens, that we were generally speared the wraft of Hurricane Beryl, with no loss of life or significant destruction here on Saint Lucia, we must reflect on whether the country was adequately prepared for this weather system. The Ministry of Infrastructure in its present configuration takes a lead role in national preparation.…
Read more
by Content Manager